Uncrossing the Wires

Entries tagged as ‘obama’

Infuriated

15 September 2008 · Leave a Comment

Karl Rove spoke out against negative campaigning on Sunday, citing specific examples from both the Obama and McCain campaigns.  Rudy Guiliani echoed his comments a little later in the day.  I agree with them completely on this, it seems to me also that this typical campaign BS.

My previous emails to both campaigns have gotten me onto the email list from Obama’s campaign, I have been getting at least one email a day (yes, of course I have saved them, and if there is interest, I would be willing to try to assemble them into some sort of zip file).

Here is a direct quote of the email I received this morning when I did checked my email:

Rick –

Even Karl Rove had to admit yesterday that the McCain campaign’s lies and negative attacks have gone “too far.”

John McCain is running the most negative and dishonest campaign in modern presidential history. He has demonstrated that he’d rather lose his integrity than lose this election.

It’s right out of the Bush-Rove playbook. Unfortunately, as Karl Rove knows better than anyone, these shameful tactics have worked in the past.

This year, we can’t let that happen.

Our goal is to bring 50,000 new donors into our movement by Friday at midnight.

And if you make your first online donation today, your gift will go twice as far. A previous donor has promised to match every dollar you donate.

Double your impact right now. Your matched donation of $5 will become $10 if you donate today.

The culture of corruption and dishonesty that has hurt America so badly the last eight years is playing an even larger role in McCain’s campaign.

Just this past week, John McCain hired a Washington super-lobbyist to fill positions in a potential McCain-Palin White House. At least 177 lobbyists have been on McCain’s campaign staff, and apparently he hopes to run the White House the same way.

Also this week, the McCain campaign continued to repeat a number of outrageous lies, even after watchdogs in the media called them “shamelessly misleading,” “thoroughly dishonest,” and “a toxic mix of lies and double-speak.”

They also lied about the crowd size at one of their rallies — reporting 23,000 attendees when there were only 8,000.

McCain’s campaign — run on lobbyists and lies — is no match for this unprecedented grassroots movement. More than 2,500,000 people have stepped up to own a piece of this campaign.

But if we want change, we must continue to grow this movement and put an end to these dishonorable political tactics. And we have just 50 days left to do it.

Right now, a previous donor — an ordinary person just like you — has promised to match your donation if you step up today.

Double your impact to combat McCain’s dishonest campaign tactics — make a matched donation of $5 or more today:

https://donate.barackobama.com/match

Thanks for all you do,

David

David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

That hypocritical blantant distortion of truth was too much for me, and I have sent the following reply back to his campaign.

I have just received David Plouffe’s email regarding Karl Rove’s comments on negative campaigning going to far by the McCain campaign. Though I agree completely with Mr. Rove’s comments, which were also echoed by Rudy Guiliani, you have omitted one detail from your message. That one detail is that those comments were directed equally at YOUR campaign and McCain’s. Shame on your for this hypocritical distortion and misrepresentation in your campaign emails. You obviously do not get the point, and worse, this proves just how willing you are to distort and misrepresent the facts to suit your needs. How stupid do you think we voters are?

Though I have never been an Obama supporter, I have been listening, particularly on energy, with an open mind, and trying to decide who I will honor with my vote. The Audacity of Hope? How about the audacity to claim change when your ethics and methods are nothing but politics as usual, exactly what has driven congressional approval ratings to their lowest levels ever.

Please remove me from your mailing lists.

I had really hoped to be able to avoid one sided comments on this blog, instead focusing on the extremely important energy issues, however Obama’s email, in my opinion, crossed the line. Though I stand by my earlier comments that I will vote for whomever can convince me they have the best plan for attacking oil imports.   I cannot imagine a situation now where I would be able to believe much of anything I hear from the Obama campaign, especially on something as critical as energy and oil imports.

Rick

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,

Interesting Article

16 August 2008 · Leave a Comment

I just read a very interesting article on the Fox News Forum by James Pinkerton.  The gist of the article is that whomever is elected as the 44th President brings Arnold Schwarzenegger aboard as the newly created position of Energy and Environment Czar.

Rick

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Just sent to Obama and McCain campaigns

20 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

Excuse me a moment, Obama Campaign staffers, and McCain campaign staffers. I know that nothing I write can get anywhere close to either candidate before passing through several levels of staff, so I am addressing this to you, the worker who will read it for the first time. It does get a bit wordy, I apologize for that, but I have made it as brief as I can without sacrificing the point.

I am asking both candidates to respond to the following question. If you are elected, and re-elected, at the time you leave office after 8 years, please give me your best estimate of the following statistics:

Percentage of our oil we are importing (1973 = 35%, 2008 = 60%+)

Percentage of our energy derived from renewable sources (1973 8.4%, 2007 7% (year end, latest figures I have found, so far))

Price we will have to pay to put one gallon of gas in our car (we all know how ugly that number is today)

I will decide my vote based on the responses to this request. I can see several possible outcomes:

Neither candidate responds – I will understand that politics as normal is the rule of the day. I will also conclude that neither candidate has a solid grasp on the significance of our energy crisis, and has no solid plan to solve it.

I get a response from one or both campaigns, whether directly, or through listening to the campaign hype. Any candidate able to communicate an response, no matter what their vehicle, will get one “Atta Candidate”,1 or AC for short. added to their account.

I will be listening to all of the hype, and once that first AC is earned, further ACs may be earned your ability to convince me that you know what you are talking about, and/or, that you are indeed committed to eliminating our oil imports as fast as reasonably possible.

My vote will go to whomever has the most ACs when I cast my vote.

A word of warning, however, don’t be setting off my Energy BS Detector. I have some experience in the energy industry, worked in it for more than 30 years. Not only in the industry, my specialty was Procurement. I have been trained in BS detection by some of the best around, including some senior level staff from Bechtel. My experience, combined with the wealth of statistical information published by the Department of Energy, give me a pretty well developed ability to spot weaknesses, and of course, outright mis-statements of fact. An outright lie will automatically trigger a Full BS Alert (FBSA), which resets the AC score to negative 5. I may also issue lesser BS1s, BS2s, or BS3s, (each reducing your score of ACs by that number) for lesser instances, at my sole discretion.

Considering the profound role Energy plays in our current crises, I have decided to focus my efforts on this arena. I will apply your net AC/BS score to all of the issues, and vote based on that score. If you’re BS’ing me on Energy, I will assume you are BS’ing me everywhere. Accumulating ACs on Energy subject, an area I understand, also increases your credibility on the rest of the issues, where matters are not so simple to define. Convince me you have the best plan, and the commitment to stay with it, I will trust you with it all.

Good luck on the campaign, I know it will be entertaining. With my BS Detector by my side, I will be able to appreciate the entertainment value far more this time. And, I believe, better meet my responsibility to the United States of America by casting the most carefully and accurately considered vote of my life. This is as it should be. The issues our vote will decide this time are at least as important as any in my 41 years of being able to vote, perhaps, as I personally believe, even more so. I owe this much to my country, along with an apology for taking so long to figure it out.

1. “Atta Candidate” or “AC” comes from the old fashioned American slang term of “Atta Boy” but modified for political correctness.

Rick Olson

US Citizen retired and living in Thailand

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Found some Great Info

15 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

And some not so great, sigh.  More about the not so great, later.  While researching to verify Fox New’s statement that oil imports for 1973 were 35%, I ran across a good article at the Wiki on the 1973 Oil Crisis.  Fascinating article, lots of details I had forgotten about.  How many of us remember what initiated that first Oil Crisis?  I didn’t.

The 1973 oil crisis began on October 17, 1973, when the members of Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC, consisting of the Arab members of OPEC plus Egypt and Syria) announced, as a result of the ongoing Yom Kippur War, that they would no longer ship oil to nations that had supported Israel in its conflict with Syria and Egypt (the United States, its allies in Western Europe, and Japan).

There is also a fascinating chart right beneath that opening statement of the article, showing the price history of oil from 1861 through 2007.  Wow, the spike now is almost as big as the spike of 1973 and 1979 combined.  The price of oil did not pass $40 per barrel until sometime after 2001, I can’t tell exactly from the chart.  Even when historical prices are adjusted for inflation into 2007 dollars, we only crossed $40 one time, at the end of the run up from the 1979 crisis.  Today it is $140 plus.  The cost of crude has more than trippled in less than 7 years.  Mind boggling.

I have not yet read it all, but also looks a very good source of accurate facts to help explain how we got here from where we were in 1973.  Be careful if you read it, the data does tend to lead you to some rather disturbing conclusions.  Have a look, the link is above.

I will write a separate piece on the not so good information later, but don’t want to let this much to wait.  The other issue is one source that is giving data in a very confusing way.  Whether deliberate or accidental, it sure does present golden opportunities to distort the data.  I need to do some more homework on that one.

Misinformation, hype, emotional arguments are all on the agenda for an article on how much they are hurting us in trying to solve the energy issues, so I will wait till I have that one finished and use it there, it will be a good example.

I have added the Required Reading tag to this article.

Rix

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Found a Problem, a couple actually

9 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

The biggest problem I found applies equally to both candidates, that is an abundance of well written words, with a severe shortage of facts, and to total void of footnoted facts.  Both espouse doing great things, but neither tells specifically how much energy that will save, or produce, or how much it will reduce the cost.  Neither of them tie it all together and show me how this will lead to energy independence in 20 or 30 years.  Sorry to say, but after listening to similar nice words for 35 years and finding ourselves again in a crisis, I must insist on the facts to back up proposals.

Here is a specific problem.  Obama says this:

Obama’s plan will reduce oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels per day, by 2030. This will more than offset the equivalent of the oil we would import from OPEC nations in 2030.

But Fox News says this:

During the oil embargo in 1973, we got only 35 percent of our oil from foreign sources. By 1995, we were up to 45 percent. And so far this year, we are getting 61 percent of our oil from foreign sources.

By those numbers, reducing our oil imports by 35% by 2030 as Obama proposes will still leave us importing a greater portion of our oil than we did in 1973.  A 35% reduction will not get us there, unless Fox News is lying.  Somebody is blowing smoke at us, which one.  I’m going to find out, I am going to spend the time and find the facts from reputable sources and I’ll show you what I find. And I will tell you how long it takes to find them.  Care to guess??

Rix

Rix

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Open Letter to Obama and McCain

8 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

I have just sent the following to both the Obama and McCain websites, up to them if and how they respond.

Open Letter to Obama and McCain

Gentlemen: In my humble opinion, you have both let us citizens down terribly. 35 years after the first time the price of oil more than doubled, we are importing even more of our oil than we were then. That is shameful. You, and your contemporaries in politics for these past years, have proven to me that I cannot trust you to give me straight facts, come up with real, workable solutions. Shame on you. And shame on me. I and my contemporaries over the past 35 years have allowed you to get away with it. And what I have seen so far from both of you in this current evolution of the energy crisis is – business as usual, more hype, more emotional arguments, more of the same. As Col. Potter used to say on Mash, horse hockey. We need some answers and we need them NOW.

That’s enough for me, I am going to do what I can to force you to deal with the issues honestly and sincerely. I have launched a campaign to first, establish Energy Independence as a national priority and national goal, somewhat along the lines of what President Kennedy did on going to the moon. I don’t have the clout of Kennedy, obviously, but through the internet, perhaps I can muster the support I need. I think I can. My campaign has been launched at my blog Uncrossing the Wires, a blog jointly owned by my conservative self and my liberal daughter. You will see a copy of this letter posted there.

I believe that if one of you were to stand up and pronounce your agreement with Energy Independence as a national priority, you would win the election hands down. We are fed up with it, we don’t like paying through the nose for gasoline. And we are tired of being fed emotionally charged hype, created for the sole purpose of convincing us to vote for you. You want me to vote for you? Give me facts, try to eliminate emotion from the issues, or at least reduce it as far as possible. You know well that our judgement suffers when emotions are aroused, and you use that against us. So stop it. I don’t have time to listen to you two and your huge propaganda machines try convince me to vote for you, but I will listen to factual presentations your positions on energy. Oh yes, and I will be holding you accountable to do what you promise to do.

Maybe I am just a silly old man operating in my own fantasyland believing that the overwhelming majority of the voters will agree with me on this. But maybe not, time will tell. But if I have my way, as candidates for the highest office in the nation, you will be judged by the voters to a higher standard. Your positions will be considered against the reality of the last 35 years efforts on energy. Good luck, may the best candidate win.

Rick

Citizen of the United States of America, retired and living in Thailand (where the cost of living is far far less)

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

We Are In A Mess

7 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

We are in a mess. Our economy is very shakey, some say recession, so say not, but all say it is not good. Our lovely sub prime mortage mess gave us a nice nudge causing us to slide a fair amount. Doubling the price of gasoline in a short time certainly did not help matters, and that will ripple out in price increases in so many directions. Don’t forget to factor in the flooding in the Midwest, our fall harvest is not going to be too great, to say the least. That has already driven up the price of corn, some portion of which is used to produce ethanol.

In my opinion, the economic situation is of a scale that it becomes a top national security concern. And to me, that is a very significant step. Again in my opinion, national security is always number 1 – if we don’t exist, it doesn’t matter.

The question of the day, what do we do? For starters, we recognize that our two biggest, most immediate issues, national security and the economy, are both tied to Oil. If we can solve that, we can have a much much better environment to live in. Yeah, lofty goal, world peace. But ponder seriously for a moment, what if we were energy independent, did not need to import one barrel from anyone. All of a sudden the middle east becomes far less important to us. Instead of trying to function in the area as a desperate customer of oil, we can function as a world power trying to do what is best for the world. The oil exporters will still export their oil, but the demand will be cut to ribbons by our independence. China and India are eagerly importing ever increasing amounts of oil, however, if we are no longer buying oil, I cannot reasonably see the price increasing dramatically again, and it could well come down.

That was one of my prognostications, here, look at the definition here. I am not claiming to be a genius, but when I look at the evidence, the preceding paragraph certainly seems a realistic outcome to me. But I have to admit, there are lots and lots of unproven assumptions that I am using to reach my conclusion. They are unproven because I have been unable thus far to find the answers. Doing the research is tedious. Shoot, our politician’s don’t bother to cite their sources, nor does the media. Fox News said in 1973 we were importing 35% of our oil, today we are importing 60%.

I have been led to believe that we have enough resources in ANWR, off shore areas, oil shale, coal and nuclear to be able to become energy independent, in a relatively short time, 10 years’ish. But there’s the hitch, you will note I said that I had been led to believe, I did not say I know for a fact. How many of you would have to say the same thing about your pretty solid beliefs on energy issues. My beliefs are based on the information I pick up along life’s way, same as for all of us. My primary source of news is Fox News. I think they are pretty good, but nope, I have never put them to a rigorous test. I think it is time that I do so. I think it is time that we all put all of our sources of information to some rigourous testing.

There is a whole slew of rhetoric flying around out there, let’s call it what it is, propaganda, and it is coming at us from all sides. Much of it, far far too much of it is coming at us in an emotionally charged way. We see the pundits, two liberal and two conservative, sit down in their four little boxes, and argue it out, often times complete with shouting matches. And that touches our emotions, and as soon as emotions are touched, our judgment skills begin declining. That is what ‘the establishment’ is feeding us, and it’s a bunch of BS. It inhibits our ability to make solid decisions.

We have 35 years of history fighting this very same issue, and we have done a lot, a whole lot, more than any of us can remember. Let’s work at remembering it, and looking at it, what did we try, and how did it work? Let’s put together a time line, gather the story in some sort of logical manner so we can all understand how we got to where we are right now. That will take a lot of time, but we can start with the big hitters to increase production, drilling in ANWR and/or off shore and nuclear for example, as well as ways to meet our energy needs in other ways, such as alternative fuels, solar, nuclear, any source, let’s be creative. But somehow we have to get to energy independence. In my opinion, this is the single most important issue facing us today, by far.

I am soliciting help. I will do as much as I can, but I will need help from a bunch of people, the more the merrier. This will be a major undertaking that will require a huge amount of effort. But if we can all get together, share our ideas, our knowledge and our resources, we can do it. We can create a factual history of or efforts on the energy crisis. The project will take time, and we are all busy, even me though I am retired. But if we all pitch in what we can, maybe one week a half hour, maybe as much as 2 or 3 the next, or whatever. Let’s all try to put some effort into it. I am going to try requesting help from media, business, and political sources, maybe we can convince one, or hopefully both, campaigns to help supply the facts, documented of course.

It is time to truly think outside the box on solving this problem. If you want to help answer the questions, and figure out what questions to ask, then post a response. I hope I can find a few enthusiastic people to jump in right away and figure out how to set it all up. I have some ideas, but hey, I’m just one person.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

The Solution Is So Clear

7 July 2008 · Leave a Comment

Energy Independence. Oil is a major player in our most serious issues, the issues which will shape the future of our nation, and indeed the world. That is a fact that will remain unchanged until we no longer need to beg for oil on the world market.

It is absolutely shameful of our leaders to allow us to get into this mess. We had our first taste 35 years ago, and since then we have have been scurrying about trying a great many things, encouraging alternative, discouraging known/viable sources, and although we have made progress in many areas, we still have a mess. According to Fox News in 1973 we were importing 35% of our oil, today we are importing 60%. That is going the wrong direction. Look at our situation today, now ask what it would be like if oil goes to $300 a barrel. I don’t think anyone would be so foolish as to try to convince us that $300 a barrel is totally unrealistic.

I have been led to believe that between off shore, ANWR, shale, we could produce enough to meet all of our needs. Well, that is what I think they are trying to say. Let’s be definitive, let us establish Energy Independence as a national goal. And let’s work at it even harder than we did when President Kennedy established landing on the moon as a national goal. Energy Independence is at least as important to our future, I believe much more so.

Our leaders have failed us, so it looks like we will have to do some sorting out on our own, including establishing Energy Independence as a national goal. Let’s put every option on the table, look at the facts, figure out how they best fit into the mix. We need to consider environmental impact absolutely. We need to evaluate based on overall risk, including risk to the environment.

I need to make a very important point. I cited Fox News for some stats before, and though I can show you where they said it (assuming they have the show available online), but regardless, I do not trust them. I am afraid they are pretty close, but this is an important issue, I am not about to accept Fox News, or any news organization’s word on it. The data should be relatively easy to prove/disprove from reliable documented sources. That is what we need to accumulate upon which to make our decisions, the true facts, not the flights of fantasy we have been fed for 35 years.

We need to be realistic. One reality is that we consume one heck of a lot of oil, and we need to cut that back. We have been trying for 35 years. What have we learned? Obama wants to do a windfall profits tax, and I heard a republican suggesting we roll back the speed limit to 55 again. Hmmm, been there done that on both scores. Is that the best they can come up with? This is truly mind boggling to me why neither of the two candidates for President have come forward and declared Energy Independence as a national goal. Well, let’s do it for them. Let’s set it as a national goal, and let’s do it by letting our candidates know. If enough of us demand it, they will have no choice. And that will allow the election to better focus on the issues.

Here is the hard part, we must force both sides to give us the cold facts, enough of the emotional diatribe and political games. Give us the facts, prove to us you know what you are talking about. Let’s create a place on the internet where together, we can capture the facts, and keep them together, give it an honest evaluation. We can have a place to list the questions we want answers to, then go out and find them. Kind of like a wiki for Energy Independence. As a matter of fact, I will submit the idea to them, their format would work well.

History has so eloquently what we can expect if we trust our politicians, media, business, the leaders of our society to decide. Let’s cut through the hype and look at the cold facts. I am sure that we will all be surprised in some ways, some of our ideas will be proven to be wrong, or not the best for today. I think it is time for all of us to put our beliefs to the test, let’s start with a clean page and examine the facts, decide where to get our energy from for the next 20 or 30 years. Or as long as we need to until we get to the point where energy is no longer a factor, we have more than we need. I honestly believe, that we will not get to that point if we don’t do the right things now.

I am on a quest, and I am asking for help. I am going to send this to a great many people, it will take some time to compile my mailing lists. It is first going to the blog, the one my daughter and I have. Then I will be sending it around trying to enlist support and help in the quest. A huge task done alone, but together, I am sure we can do it.

Rix Kix

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

O’Reilly Interviews Hillary

4 May 2008 · Leave a Comment

Have you seen this interview, it is, imho, excellent. Two arch rivals politically squaring off. I consider this interview to be required reading and/or viewing for all of us, she does lay out her positions clearly. Here are links to the texts of the sessions making up the interview with Hillary:

Day one, sessions 1 and 2: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353759,00.html

Day two, sessions 3 and 4: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354028,00.html

Bill will be having a similar interview with McCain this week, I will be watching it for sure. I do hope Obama accepts the invitation and does the same.

Categories: Required Reading/Viewing
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Let’s Talk About Race

4 April 2008 · Leave a Comment

Almost a year ago now, Don Imus made his name known world wide instantaneously by making that outrageous racial/sexist (don’t know the proper from of the word to use here) slur against the black members of a Rutgers ladies sports team. Not surprisingly, it generated almost immediate and vast media coverage. Much of the coverage was expressing genuine outrage, some small portion may have been expressing outrage because they wanted to gain favor with the black community, some using the opportunity to extract the gender portion of the slur (he did call them ‘hos’) to voice their outrage not only against the racial implications, but to make sure that the gender overtones we not missed. And, sad to say, but yes, probably one or two voicing their glee that someone said something that awful on the air. No matter what their viewpoint, almost everyone heard about it almost immediately and almost continually until the furor died down after Imus was fired.

What do you think the flavor of the Sermon was on the following Sunday in black churches across the nation? It would almost certainly involve opening the container of all the suffering from their long history of discrimination. And there is not a thing in the world wrong with that. Our black brothers and sisters have paid the price, they do indeed have the right to remember the sins of the past and pay their respects to their forefathers and mothers who far too often paid the ultimate price. Allow us to join in the celebration of these true Hero’s, at least those of us who sincerely wish to.

I am sure also that there was a lot of anger vented in most of those black churches over the incident. And that would have been OK too, had the emotions are brought back under control before being unleashed on the public.

But there is one concept that was almost certainly not even thought of. The concept I am referring to is that the entire episode should have been viewed as one more verification that the war has been won, the war that Dr. Martin Luther King gave his life for. Phew, heavy statement, not even thought of. Perhaps there were a few isolated souls in our nation who had the thought, but during that angry storm of outrage swirling around everywhere, they surely would have kept quiet about it.

I believe even Dr. Martin Luther King foresaw this sort of problem when he said: “But there is something that I must say to my people, who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice: In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.” (Link) 

“I Have a Dream” is one of the most powerful speeches ever made in our nation’s history, it was delivered on August 28, 1963, not quite 45 years ago, at the Lincoln Monument in Washington DC. Go to that link, re-read the entire text, please, even better if you can manage the time, watch the video, it is less than 20 minutes, and well worth the time.

Warning: Incendiary statement follows!!!

I contend that every aspect of Dr. King’s dream has been fulfilled, except his Biblical reference to the End Times. Re-read that speech closely, look at what he is dreaming about, watch the video, hear the crowd murmur their agreement with his key points. I contend that Dr. Kings dreams have been fulfilled, that the war has been won, and that episodes like the Don Imus case should be viewed as victories. I contend that the laws have been passed and/or modified, that do truly give those very rights that Dr. King gave his life fighting for to not only black people, but all people in the United States, regardless of racial or ethnic origin. Thank you Dr. King.

I will grant you that there are still racists out there, and that racism does still exist. That is because racism is a matter of belief, it resides inside individuals, the same personal one on one basis you referred to Doj. We can not legislate the beliefs away, nor can we wish them away. They will only go away when the individual chooses to let them go.

No government can regulate the belief’s of it’s citizens, can we say Mind Control. A government can, however, regulate the actions of it’s citizens, it can pass laws making it illegal to discriminate against a person because of race, refuse a loan to a person because they are black, and so on. The United States of America has, I contend, done an outstanding job of guaranteeing those basic rights to all citizens. This is a direct result of the civil rights movement, and as such, in part, a result of the “I Have a Dream” speech.

Dr. King did not ask for racism to end, he asked to “cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.” I believe he realized the futility of trying to eliminate racism, choosing to focus instead on the results of racism, the basic rights that were being denied to blacks simply because of the color of their skin. Those results were indeed within the capability of government to control, to eliminate, if the government chose to do so.

Enough of the citizens of the USA heard those words, and were able to comprehend their validty and truth, that, over the following years our government did amend the laws and pass new laws, did what was necessary to guarantee that no citizen is discriminated against because of his race.

Dr. King and the other Civil Rights leaders of his time, essentially created a large Weapon of Mass Destruction. That weapon consisted of a huge army of people willing to stand in the heart of our government and call them to task. It was an army that would not be scared off by threats of violence, and army that proved they were willing to pay even the ultimate price in pursuit of equality.

As effective as their WMD was, and it was very effective, the WMD was not what led to the profound and long lasting changes that have occurred in our society. What had the most profound impact was the validity and truth of his message. The WMD was necessary to get enough people’s attention. But it was the truth of the message, the indisputable fact that although we proclaim that “all men are created equal” all men were NOT being treated equally in our great nation. That indisputable reality is what produced the sweeping and lasting changes in our nation.

Following the Imus slur, there was an explosion of words denouncing the slur, and of course repeating it for any who may have missed it. The words quickly became emotional, provoking emotional responses, leading to more emotional responses. For the duration of the event, a little over a week, everywhere we turned we saw an update on the situation, the latest in the now emotionally charged rhetoric, and yes, the fact that Imus was fired was made public and the furor then died down.

Why? Why did we subject ourselves to a week of explosive emotional rhetoric? The issue, though a horrendous racial slur, was really a minor, insignificant, easily dealt with issue. An idiot broadcast an unacceptable statement to whomever was listening, he deserved to be punished for it, and he was. What portion of Americans believe he should have been able to say what he said without punishment? Though the number may be disappointingly high, as long as it is not as large as 50% plus one, it does not matter.

That explosion of emotion may have served a positive purpose as a device to force and/or speed the appropriate actions (punishment) to be taken. Perhaps. But it would not have touched the root cause of the problem. The root cause has nothing to do with race, nor has it anything to do with any lofty ideals. The root cause comes straight down to money. Imus, together with Howard Stern and a few others, have created a new category of media personality’s known as ‘shock jocks.’ Their highly publicized intent is to push the envelope, say and do the most outrageous things they can possible get away with, shock their listeners. We have rewarded them for their creativity by listening to them, listening in large numbers. The numbers give them the advertisers, more outrageous comments and actions bring them more listeners, which brings them more money.

Did the explosion of rhetoric bring any positive results, any lasting changes? Not much, if any. Imus is back at work, different network now, but still a shock jock, still trying to top Howard Stern. Did it prevent such an outrageous slur to appear on the media again? I seriously doubt it, if nothing else, the shock jocks are still at it, still pushing the envelope, still trying to get as close to that line as they can. I have complete confidence that they will cross that line again, so we will all have the opportunity to go through another couple of weeks of turmoil.

I will point out one result that the explosion of rhetoric did absolutely produce, a rather negative result. It brought anger and resentment back to the surface, giving everyone an opportunity to bring out their favorite prejudices and take them for a walk. Those whites who believed so already, could say “yep, the N words are still at it…” And those blacks who believed so already could say “yep, whitey is still at it…” That near feeding frenzy in the media did nothing at all to help them change their racist thinking. It simply provided one more validation that nothing has changed, the XXXXX’s are still as bad as always.

What if, in response to the Imus slur, the entire black community had done nothing more than say simply, as calmly as possible, that they are outraged at this racial slur. What if there had been no explosion of inflammatory denouncements at all, replaced instead with a few unemotionally worded statements denouncing the slur? Would the outcome have been different, would Imus still have been fired, would he still have been hired a few months later by a competing network, where he is broadcasting today? We will never know.

Was it worth it? Yes, worth it, because there was a price paid for that all of that turmoil. The price was paid by prolonging the emotional suffering of the victims of that slur. It was paid by the emotional suffering of numerous blacks, who where shown this slur, and who, naturally, shared the pain of a slur against their race. The price was paid by whites, including old farts retired and living in Thailand, who had to ask themselves again, how did we get to the point where something like this could be said on the air. And the price is being paid in the form of increased or more solid hatred by the haters of blacks and whites. Was it worth it?

Yes, I contend that the war is won, I contend that even if the explosion of anger had been toned down that the same result would have occurred, Imus would have still be nailed for his outrageous behavior. And we would not have had to pay nearly as high a price.

I contend that that war is won because I truly believe that the vast majority of Americans do believe those words from the Declaration of independence, “ALL men are created equal” represent a core value of our society, one which they would fight literally to death to support. It wasn’t always that way, absolutely not. And I can’t tell you when we finally reached that point, but I can tell you that I truly believe we have reached it somewhere in the last 45 years.

The only way we can ever hope to eliminate or even significantly reduce the racial prejudices that exist in this country, is to stop bringing out the big guns, the weapons of mass destruction, until and if they are proven to be needed. Let ‘the system’ or ‘the establishment’ belly up to the bar and either do the right thing because it is the right thing, or not. If not, I am confident that there are enough people who do believe it is the right thing, and equally confident that those people have enough relatively mild weapons in their arsenal, maybe talk of a boycott of advertisers if appropriate steps were not being taken, or not being taken fast enough.

Beating up racists in the media for 45 years has not made racism go away, nor do I believe beating them up for another 45 years will make it go away. In fact, I am afraid that some elements in our society see these explosions as one sure method of media attention, fair game for those (shock jocks) who strive to be as outrageous as possible. The shock jocks know that if they say the right thing (the wrong thing to most of us) the media will explode, ratings will soar, and they will be the new king of shock jocks, at least for a little while. The shock jocks are only the tip of the iceberg on this score, there are only a few of them. The same concept is well known, and used, by far more than the shock jocks.

For the sake of argument, let us assume for a moment that I am correct in my assertion that the overwhelming majority of Americans agree Imus statement was deplorable and he should have been punished. If this were true, ponder what would happen to a charismatic black leader who changed tactics, and began promoting the idea that the Dr. Kings war had been won, victory had been achieved. What would happen in our society if he were able to convince other black leaders that he was correct. What if the prevailing theme in some black churches were changed from ‘whitey is still holding us down’, to ‘we won, whitey can try, but he can not hold us down any longer.’ Imagine what progress could be made in only say, 4 years, no, make that 3. Now imagine how this utopian black leader would do if he decided to run for president in 2012.

Dr. King and the other leaders of the Civil Rights movement created the first weapon of mass destruction – a huge number of righteously angry blacks willing to die for their rights – and used the weapon quite effectively. It was needed, and we all owe them a debt of gratitude. Their skilled use of the WMD got enough attention, their ethical tactics and eloquence delivered their message, and the truth and validy of that message brought lasting change. They won the war.

So now it is time to put the WMD away, take advantage of the rights and freedoms won. Even with the WMD put away, we know it exists, we know it can be re-assembled if needed, and that is all that is needed. Most of us don’t need the WMD, we know that Dr. King was right. We are outraged at racial slurs because they are wrong, not because there is a WMD in the wings. The war is won.

Let us stop feeding our nation the painful history of racial inequity, and begin feeding it instead the pride of victory. Let us give credit where credit is due. Not only did Dr. King and his compatriots succeed motivating the long process of rendering discrimination as illegal, but they succeeded also in winning the hearts and minds of a great many non-black Americans. It is because of their efforts and sacrifices that today, when an idiot spews out a racial slur on a radio broadcast, it is a ‘no-brainer’ for the overwhelming majority of our nation to immediately conclude that the spewer did wrong and should expect trouble. That, IMHO, spells victory.

RixKix

Categories: Race
Tagged: , , , , ,